Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.4 ecozone: MIE food: bjPz, jiCi, jiCvf class:
MRE = 0.052 habitat: 0jMp, jiMb gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.007 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 2555 2559 (0.00153) d life span HyndPott1996
Lp 12.3 12.22 (0.006562) cm total length at puberty for females HyndPott1996
Lpm 12 11.99 (0.001003) cm total length at puberty for males HyndPott1996
Li 30 30.34 (0.01121) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00035 0.00035 (1.082e-05) g wet weight at birth HyndPott1996
Wwp 18.5 18.57 (0.004016) g wet weight at puberty fishbase, HyndPott1996
Wwi 285 284.2 (0.002716) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 2.192e+04 430.2 (0.9804) g Reprod rate max rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.08514) HyndPott1996
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.0867) HyndPott1996

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Sillago robusta Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02154 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 28.05 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3723 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8012 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00832*(TL in cm)^3.07 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation