Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPNW food: bjPz, jiCvf, jiCic class:
MRE = 0.055 habitat: 0jMm, jiMr, jiMpe gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.007 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 4380 4389 (0.001995) d life span MasuSako2003
Lp 24.9 23.08 (0.07319) cm fork length at puberty Wiki
Li 50 52.22 (0.04436) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.0016 0.001561 (0.02429) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 93.6 198.5 (1.121) g wet weight at puberty fishbase, guess
Wwi 4038 2300 (0.4304) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 1096 1074 (0.0198) #/d maximum reprod rate AllaFalt2004

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.04254) MasuSako2003
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.05617) MasuSako2003
tW_f time since birth weight (0.1341) MasuSako2003
tW_m time since birth weight (0.1402) MasuSako2003

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Sphyraena pinguis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.04115 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 59.67 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1747 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9052 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8029 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • Data Wwi and Wwp were ignored due to inconsistency with tL and tW data

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00661*(TL in cm)^2.94 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation