Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPNW food: bjPz, jiCvf, jiCic class:
MRE = 0.055 habitat: 0jMm, jiMr, jiMpe gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.006 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 4380 4388 (0.001894) d life span MasuSako2003
Lp 24.9 22.52 (0.09558) cm fork length at puberty Wiki
Li 50 53.27 (0.06539) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.0016 0.001573 (0.01708) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 93.6 180.4 (0.9272) g wet weight at puberty fishbase, guess
Wwi 4038 2387 (0.4088) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 1096 1081 (0.01353) #/d maximum reprod rate AllaFalt2004

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.0413) MasuSako2003
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.05446) MasuSako2003
tW_f time since birth weight (0.1303) MasuSako2003
tW_m time since birth weight (0.1371) MasuSako2003

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Sphyraena pinguis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.04434 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 60.02 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1739 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9108 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8019 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
s_s 0.01 0.002053 - supply stress

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • Data Wwi and Wwp were ignored due to inconsistency with tL and tW data

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00661*(TL in cm)^2.94 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation