Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: abj | climate: Csa, Dfa | migrate: | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.7 | ecozone: THp | food: bjCi, piO | class: |
| MRE = 0.126 | habitat: 0iFc, 0iFl | gender: D | order: |
| SMSE = 0.028 | embryo: Fg | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ah_19 | 4.5 | 4.214 | (0.06363) | d | age at hatching | KuprMamc2011 |
| ah_27 | 1.5 | 1.943 | (0.2952) | d | age at hatching at 27.5 degrees | KuprMamc2011 |
| ab_19 | 10.5 | 9.868 | (0.06021) | d | age at birth | KuprMamc2011 |
| ab_27 | 5 | 4.55 | (0.09003) | d | age at birth | KuprMamc2011 |
| tp | 912.5 | 796.4 | (0.1273) | d | time since birth at puberty | Sasi2004 |
| am | 6460 | 6871 | (0.06359) | d | life span | fischlexikon |
| Lh | 0.59 | 0.4666 | (0.2091) | cm | total length at hatch | KuprMamc2011 |
| Lb | 0.785 | 1.033 | (0.316) | cm | total length at birth | KuprMamc2011 |
| Lp | 19.18 | 16.76 | (0.1261) | cm | forked length at puberty female | KiliBece2016 |
| Lpm | 15.32 | 14.23 | (0.07131) | cm | forked length at puberty male | KiliBece2016 |
| Li | 70 | 62.12 | (0.1126) | cm | ultimate total length | fischlexikon |
| Ww0 | 0.000524 | 0.000476 | (0.0916) | g | initial wet weigh | fishbase |
| Wwh | 0.1238 | 0.0003801 | (0.9969) | g | wet weight at hatch | Calt2000 |
| Wwb | 0.151 | 0.0004536 | (0.997) | g | wet weight at birth | Calt2000 |
| Wwi | 5000 | 5119 | (0.02373) | g | ultimate wet weight | fischlexikon |
| Ri | 411 | 1291 | (2.141) | #/d | maximum reprod rate | fischlexikon |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tL_f |   | time since birth | fork length | (0.08277) | KocErdo2007 |
| tL3 | | time since birth | fork length | (0.04783) | Sasi2004 |
| tL_m | | time since birth | fork length | (0.09003) | KocErdo2007 |
| tWw_f |   | time since birth | wet weight | (0.1239) | KocErdo2007 |
| tWw2 | | time since birth | wet weight | (0.1326) | Sasi2004 |
| tWw_m | | time since birth | wet weight | (0.1406) | KocErdo2007 |
| LWw_f |   | fork length | wet weight | (0.1663) | KocErdo2007 |
| LWw1 | | fork length | wet weight | (0.1223) | Sasi2004 |
| LN |  | fork length | fecundity | (0.3016) | Sasi2004 |
| WN |  | wet weight | fecundity | (0.2809) | Sasi2004 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Squalius cephalus | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.01535 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| p_M | 18 | 33.8 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| k | 0.3 | 0.3092 | - | maintenance ratio |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.9034 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8006 | - | growth efficiency |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
Discussion
- Males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
- Weights at hatch and birth were ignored due to inconsistency with egg size
- Ultimate reproduction was ignored due to inconsistency LN and WwN data; the value for Ri probably concerns a smaller fish
- mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females
Bibliography