Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: BSk, Csa migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biCi, jiHl, jiD class:
MRE = 0.022 habitat: 0iFp, 0iFm gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.001 embryo: Fh reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 2555 2554 (0.0002396) d life span fishbase
Lp 7 6.693 (0.0439) cm fork length at puberty fishbase
Li 26 26.01 (0.00053) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.0009 0.0009107 (0.01194) g wet weight at birth FernHerr1995
Wwp 4.3 4.364 (0.01482) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 262 256.2 (0.02195) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 82.19 82.48 (0.00352) #/d gonado somatic index FernHerr1995

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.03384) FernHerr1995
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.0259) FernHerr1995

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Squalius pyrenaicus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01954 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 7.234 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0004151 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3009 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.7997 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7978 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • temperatures are guessed
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00977*(TL in cm)^3.13 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation