Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAW food: biCi, jiHl class:
MRE = 0.025 habitat: 0iMp, jiMc gender: Hsm order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 6.5 6.618 (0.01813) d age at birth guess
am 3650 3628 (0.005967) d life span guess
Lp 15.5 15.21 (0.01883) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 46 45.65 (0.007619) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00032 0.0003145 (0.01725) g wet weight at birth fishbase
Wwp 68.4 67.44 (0.01405) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 1826 1824 (0.001167) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.045 0.04426 (0.01655) g/g gonado-somatic index guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth fork length (0.0552) Erzi1991

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Stenotomus chrysops Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02018 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 20.75 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.504 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9574 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8002 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01738*(TL in cm)^3.02 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation