Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: BW migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biPz, biCi class:
MRE = 0.076 habitat: 0jFr, jiFl gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.014 embryo: Fg reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 15 15.64 (0.04279) d age at birth guess
am 3650 3649 (0.0003344) d life span TsogMend2017
Lp 16 15.14 (0.05376) cm total length at puberty guess
Li 38.2 38.11 (0.002443) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0048 0.004755 (0.009414) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 28.6 29.15 (0.01936) g wet weight at puberty fishbase, guess
Wwi 432.4 464.9 (0.07502) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 16.44 16.45 (0.0008615) #/d max reoduction rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.133) TsogMend2017
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.09516) TsogMend2017
LWw total length wet weight (0.105) TsogMend2017

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Thymallus baicalensis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.0824 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 27.35 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3819 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8884 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8012 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • Data Wwi is ignorned due to incinsistency with LW data

Facts

  • length-weight: W in g = 0.00501*(TL in cm)^3.12 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation