Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: BW migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biO class:
MRE = 0.087 habitat: 0jFr, jiFl gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.014 embryo: Fg reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 15 15.83 (0.0553) d age at birth guess
am 7300 7299 (0.0001358) d life span TsogMend2017
Lp 17 15.82 (0.06951) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 48.4 48.5 (0.00215) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0048 0.004722 (0.01629) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 32.3 33.08 (0.02419) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 845 953.7 (0.1287) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 21.92 21.95 (0.001617) #/d max reoduction rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.1147) TsogMend2017
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.1366) TsogMend2017
LWw total length wet weight (0.1332) TsogMend2017

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Thymallus nigrescens Unit Description
v 0.02 0.08882 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 15.92 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.6574 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8877 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7994 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • Data Wwi is ignorned due to incinsistency with LW data

Facts

  • length-weight: W in g = 0.00468*(TL in cm)^3.12 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation