Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPW food: biCi, biPz class:
MRE = 0.041 habitat: biMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Mc reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 6 5.814 (0.03096) d age at birth guess
am 90 90 (5.152e-05) d life span WintSout2008
Lp 1.2 1.264 (0.05364) cm total length at puberty WintSout2008
Li 2.3 2.43 (0.05661) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0002771 0.0002809 (0.01356) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 0.0075 0.007369 (0.01751) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 0.052 0.05232 (0.006221) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 0.5342 0.5347 (0.0008836) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth std length (0.05526) WintSout2008
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth std length (0.04709) WintSout2008

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Trimma nasa Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 114 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.0916 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8011 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • length-weight: weight in g = 0.01023*(TL in cm)^3.02 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation