Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MA migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MINE, MPSW food: biCi, biPz class:
MRE = 0.048 habitat: 0pMp, piMcb gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.004 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1825 1825 (9.399e-05) d life span fishbase
Lp 12.6 12.39 (0.01703) cm fork length at puberty fishbase
Li 19.8 22.18 (0.12) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00062 0.0005978 (0.03587) g wet weight at birth guess
Ri 169.9 163.8 (0.03552) #/d maximum reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.04925) KayaBenl1999
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.03688) KayaBenl1999
LW_f fork length wet weight (0.07845) KayaBenl1999
LW_m fork length wet weight (0.09086) KayaBenl1999

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Upeneus moluccensis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02254 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.85 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 22.42 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8007 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • Temperatures are guessed
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Bibliography

Citation