Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MINE, MPSW food: biCi, biPz class:
MRE = 0.106 habitat: 0pMp, piMcb, piMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.025 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1825 1825 (2.763e-05) d life span fishbase
Lp 9.7 9.678 (0.002226) cm fork length at puberty PavlHa2015
Li 22.5 23.21 (0.03167) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00062 0.0006126 (0.0119) g wet weight at birth guess
Ww13 35.5 36.01 (0.01439) g wet weight at FL 12.9 cm PavlHa2015
Ri 169.9 167.9 (0.01174) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.1612) PavlHa2015
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.1636) PavlHa2015

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Upeneus tragula Unit Description
v 0.02 0.0187 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.85 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 16.26 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.7996 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • Temperatures are guessed
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.01318*(TL in cm)^3.10 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation