Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MB migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MIE food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.041 habitat: 0iMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Mv reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 335.5 349 (0.04022) d age at birth WhitPott2005
am 5110 5094 (0.003069) d life span WhitPott2005
Lb 11 10.43 (0.05144) cm disc width at birth WhitPott2005
Lp 22.29 21.96 (0.01469) cm disc width at puberty for females WhitPott2005
Lpm 20.69 20.65 (0.002023) cm disc width at puberty for males WhitPott2005
Li 27.2 27.6 (0.01476) cm ultimate disc width for females WhitPott2005
Lim 25.6 27.56 (0.07654) cm ultimate disc width for males WhitPott2005
Wwi 329 334.6 (0.01709) g ultimate wet weight for females WhitPott2005
Wwim 340 332.8 (0.02103) g ultimate wet weight for males WhitPott2005
Ri 0.00411 0.004065 (0.01083) #/d maximum reprod rate WhitPott2005

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth disc width (0.05275) WhitPott2005
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth disc width (0.06161) WhitPott2005

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Urolophus paucimaculatus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.03364 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.6953 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 19.12 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8005 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • males and females are assumed to differ in {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 10^-5.20 * (DW in mm)^3.17 for females; 10^-5.03 * (DW in mm)^3.14 for males (Ref: WhitPott2005)

Bibliography

Citation