Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: BSk, Dwa migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biCi, jiD class:
MRE = 0.067 habitat: 0iFr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.008 embryo: Fg reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 5475 5424 (0.009254) d life span fishbase
Lp 18.7 19.07 (0.01993) cm fork length at puberty for females OkgeElp2011
Li 50 46.72 (0.06554) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.0042 0.003837 (0.08651) g wet weight at birth WiesSchi1992
Wwi 1400 1440 (0.02851) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 54.79 53.95 (0.01545) #/d max reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.07319) OkgeElp2011
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth fork length (0.07529) OkgeElp2011
tW_f time since birth wet weight (0.1596) OkgeElp2011
tW_m time since birth wet weight (0.1179) OkgeElp2011

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Vimba vimba Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01214 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 17.2 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.611 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.7873 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7961 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • Temperature during reproduction in tL/tW data was 14.8C, 25 in June and 25.6 in July
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Bibliography

Citation